Artificial intelligence and assessment in university teacher education programs: sociomaterial configurations and contested imaginaries.

Main Article Content

Federico Sambrizzi

Abstract

This article is part of an ongoing master’s research project that examines university assessment practices in the context of the incorporation of natural language artificial intelligence into teacher education programs at the Faculty of Philosophy, Humanities and Arts. The study proposes a conceptual shift that moves beyond an instrumental understanding of artificial intelligence as a mere tool and instead approaches it as an actant within complex sociomaterial configurations. Drawing on a perspective inspired by Actor-Network Theory and the concept of sociotechnical imaginaries, the article analyzes how the incorporation of these technologies participates in the alignment of assessment practices and in the stabilization of particular pedagogical rationalities. In dialogue with the didactics of error, it problematizes the tendency to redefine assessment in terms of efficiency and standardization, questioning the effects that these representations may have on teacher education. Methodologically, the study adopts a qualitative interpretive approach based on in-depth interviews with teacher educators, aimed at reconstructing the networks of meaning and the problematizations that accompany the integration of artificial intelligence. The article does not present conclusive results; rather, it offers an analytical framework for understanding the sociomaterial configurations and contested imaginaries at stake in university teacher education assessment.

Article Details

Section

Artículos

How to Cite

Artificial intelligence and assessment in university teacher education programs: sociomaterial configurations and contested imaginaries. (2026). Pre-University and University Scientific Contributions, 9, 43-56. https://revista.adicus.org.ar/index.php/ccpu/article/view/18

References

Astolfi, J.-P. (2003). El error, un medio para enseñar. Díada.

Bacchi, C. (2009). Analysing policy: What’s the problem represented to be? Pearson.

Bacchi, C., & Goodwin, S. (2016). Poststructural policy analysis: A guide to practice. Palgrave Macmillan.

Bachelard, G. (2000). La formación del espíritu científico. Siglo XXI. (Trabajo original publicado en 1938)

Berti, A. F. (2022). Herramienta. En D. Parente, A. F. Berti, & C. Celis Bueno (Eds.), Glosario de filosofía de la técnica (pp. 249–252). La Cebra.

Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Sage.

Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine.

Guber, R. (2001). La etnografía: Método, campo y reflexividad. Norma.

Jasanoff, S., & Kim, S.-H. (Eds.). (2015). Dreamscapes of modernity: Sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power. University of Chicago Press.

Latour, B. (2008). Reensamblar lo social: Una introducción a la teoría del actor-red. Manantial. (Trabajo original publicado en 2005)

Latour, B. (2013). An inquiry into modes of existence: An anthropology of the moderns. Harvard University Press.

Lion, C., Bravo, S., & Torres, E. (2024). La inteligencia artificial en la educación: Salir de la caja negra. Educación, Lenguaje y Sociedad, 23(23), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.19137/els-2024-232303

Rahm, L., & Rahm-Skågeby, J. (2023). Imaginaries and problematizations: A heuristic perspective in the age of artificial intelligence in education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54, 1147–1159.

Scolari, C. A. (2014). Alfabetismo transmedia: Un programa de investigación. Revista Anfibia. https://www.revistaanfibia.com/alfabetismo-transmedia/

Scolari, C. A. (2024). El medio rebelde (o cómo la escuela no pudo pasteurizar a los móviles). Revista Anfibia. https://www.revistaanfibia.com/el-medio-rebelde/

Vasilachis de Gialdino, I. (2006). Estrategias de investigación cualitativa. Gedisa.